News

Towards an EU regulatory framework on Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF)

As third-party litigation funding (TPLF) rapidly expands across Europe, the European Justice Forum has released a new policy brief outlining a clear way forward: a harmonised EU regulatory framework to safeguard judicial systems, protect consumers and businesses, and support the EU’s economic resilience and competitiveness.

Building on international best practices and independent research, the paper presents a balanced, four-pillar approach to contribute to the policy debate on how to best regulate TPLF:

  1. Transparency: Mandatory disclosure of funders, funding sources, and redacted agreements to all parties, with unredacted versions to courts. Funders should be subject to authorisation, registration, and supervision.
  2. Protection of claimants’ rights: joint liability for adverse costs, minimum capital requirements, no funder control over case strategy or outcomes, and minimum payouts to claimants with caps on funder and intermediary fees.
  3. Ethical standards: Prohibition of funding arrangements with conflicts of interest, and fiduciary duties requiring funders to act in the best interests of claimants/beneficiaries.
  4. Harmonized regulatory framework: Consistent application of these rules across all mass litigation and arbitration to prevent circumvention and ensure legal certainty in the EU.

These recommendations reflect growing political momentum, supported by the European Parliament’s 2022 resolution and calls from European industry groups, and are grounded in recent research by ECIPE, the European Law Institute , and EJF itself.

Ultimately, EJF’s brief underscores that responsible regulation can both protect consumers and judicial integrity and preserve Europe’s legal and economic systems. By acting now, the EU can set a global standard for litigation funding that strengthens, rather than compromises, access to justice.

Read the full policy brief below.

Share this page

News

Amendment to product liability law met with mixed reactions

Berlin: The draft bill presented by the Federal Government “on the modernisation of product liability law” has received mixed reviews from experts. At a public hearing of the Committee on Law and Consumer Protection on Monday, the planned 1:1 implementation of a corresponding EU directive was criticised by some as going too far and by others as being too unambitious.

read more

News

Commission Guidance for Implementation of the EU Product Liability Directive

In 2024, the European Union made significant changes to the EU product liability regime by amending the Product Liability Directive (“PLD”), to update it in light of technological and other developments. The EU and EFTA Member States, together with Northern Ireland, are required to transpose the revised PLD by the end of 2026. The law will then enter into application in product liability cases before judges throughout the EU, EFTA and Northern Ireland.

read more

News

Press Release: Revised Product Liability Directive risks undermining Single Market coherence, business leaders warn

Roundtable in Brussels warns diverging implementations of the revised Product Liability Directive increase litigation risk and undermine EU competitiveness.

Brussels, 02 April 2026 - Senior business leaders, legal experts and policymakers warned at a Brussels roundtable on 24 March that inconsistent implementations of the revised Product Liability Directive (PLD) will fragment the Single Market, increase litigation risk and weaken Europe’s competitiveness unless the European Commission provides early guidance.

read more

News

Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) in France

Pros and Cons of the new French Decree no 2025-1191 of 10 December 2025 on the admission of associations and other bodies to conduct domestic and cross-border group actions and specifying their obligations regarding publication of their fundings.

 

read more