News

EJF position on Third Party Litigation Funding (TPLF)

EJF is pleased to share its position paper regarding the legislative own initiative report of MEP Axel Voss on Responsible Private Funding of Litigation. EJF outlined points of crucial importance to achieve an effective and coherent legal architecture that safeguards against potential abuses of TPLF. This is because while collective redress mechanisms and TPLF are meant to have a positive impact for consumers in facilitating the access to justice, there is the risk – if no sufficient safeguards are put in place – that private funders’ interests (especially their interest in commercial profit) may be disconnected from – or even opposed to – consumers’ interests. Concrete examples can be seen in the US or in Australia. In Europe we are seeing an increase in cases.

EJF is pleased to share its position paper regarding the legislative own initiative report of MEP Axel Voss on Responsible Private Funding of Litigation. EJF outlined points are of crucial importance to achieve an effective and coherent legal architecture that safeguards against potential abuses of TPLF. This is because while collective redress mechanisms and TPLF are meant to have a positive impact for consumers in facilitating the access to justice, there is the risk – if no sufficient safeguards are put in place – that private funders’ interests (especially their interest in commercial profit) may be disconnected from – or even opposed to – consumers’ interests. Concrete examples can be seen in the US or in Australia. In Europe we are seeing an increase in cases.

Some of the safeguards we call for include:

  • An adequate institutional supervision of financial markets regulation;
  • Independent public supervision of TPLF activity in representative actions;
  • A need for more scrutiny and transparency over funding agreements;
  • Stricter limitation when it comes to the compensation funders could receive.
  • A reinforced “loser pays principle” and the possibility of pay-out only via public infrastructures.

The European Parliament Rapporteur of the report is still analysing the amendments to the first draft and we expect a revised text in Q1 2022. Following this review phase, a JURI Committee vote on the report can be expected.

The European Justice Forum is looking forward to fruitful conversations with stakeholders during this phase, to ensure that additional effective safeguards against the abuse of TPLF be considered. With these points, EJF calls on the European Parliament to support and approve this report in plenary, and on the European Commission to take up the Parliament’s proposal by submitting a proposal for a Directive to regulate third party litigation funding.

Share this page

News

Joint Business Statements on TPLF

On 21 January 2026, a cross-sector group of business associations issued a joint statement renewing their call for proportionate, harmonised EU-level rules on professional third-party litigation funding (TPLF). The statement highlights the rapid expansion of for-profit litigation funding in Europe, which continues to operate with limited transparency and fragmented oversight, despite the presence of more than 300 funders in the EU.

read more

News

EJF National Contributions to PLD Transposition

Starting 2026 with wishes to our Members, European and National Institutions and Partners a prosperous year from Brussels!

With intensive works across Europe on transposing the EU Product Liability Directive (PLD), EJF has participated with our submission to the PLD consultation in Sweden.

read more

News

EJF Contribution to Upcoming Irish Presidency Priorities

EJF contributed to the consultation shaping the priorities and policy programme for Ireland’s Presidency of the Council of the EU in 2026.

Ireland will hold the EU Presidency for the eighth time from July–December 2026, at a pivotal moment for Europe’s competitiveness, economic security and trust in democratic institutions.

read more