News

EJF position on Third Party Litigation Funding (TPLF)

EJF is pleased to share its position paper regarding the legislative own initiative report of MEP Axel Voss on Responsible Private Funding of Litigation. EJF outlined points of crucial importance to achieve an effective and coherent legal architecture that safeguards against potential abuses of TPLF. This is because while collective redress mechanisms and TPLF are meant to have a positive impact for consumers in facilitating the access to justice, there is the risk – if no sufficient safeguards are put in place – that private funders’ interests (especially their interest in commercial profit) may be disconnected from – or even opposed to – consumers’ interests. Concrete examples can be seen in the US or in Australia. In Europe we are seeing an increase in cases.

EJF is pleased to share its position paper regarding the legislative own initiative report of MEP Axel Voss on Responsible Private Funding of Litigation. EJF outlined points are of crucial importance to achieve an effective and coherent legal architecture that safeguards against potential abuses of TPLF. This is because while collective redress mechanisms and TPLF are meant to have a positive impact for consumers in facilitating the access to justice, there is the risk – if no sufficient safeguards are put in place – that private funders’ interests (especially their interest in commercial profit) may be disconnected from – or even opposed to – consumers’ interests. Concrete examples can be seen in the US or in Australia. In Europe we are seeing an increase in cases.

Some of the safeguards we call for include:

  • An adequate institutional supervision of financial markets regulation;
  • Independent public supervision of TPLF activity in representative actions;
  • A need for more scrutiny and transparency over funding agreements;
  • Stricter limitation when it comes to the compensation funders could receive.
  • A reinforced “loser pays principle” and the possibility of pay-out only via public infrastructures.

The European Parliament Rapporteur of the report is still analysing the amendments to the first draft and we expect a revised text in Q1 2022. Following this review phase, a JURI Committee vote on the report can be expected.

The European Justice Forum is looking forward to fruitful conversations with stakeholders during this phase, to ensure that additional effective safeguards against the abuse of TPLF be considered. With these points, EJF calls on the European Parliament to support and approve this report in plenary, and on the European Commission to take up the Parliament’s proposal by submitting a proposal for a Directive to regulate third party litigation funding.

Share this page

News

Commission Guidance for Implementation of the EU Product Liability Directive

In 2024, the European Union made significant changes to the EU product liability regime by amending the Product Liability Directive (“PLD”), to update it in light of technological and other developments. The EU and EFTA Member States, together with Northern Ireland, are required to transpose the revised PLD by the end of 2026. The law will then enter into application in product liability cases before judges throughout the EU, EFTA and Northern Ireland.

read more

News

Press Release: Revised Product Liability Directive risks undermining Single Market coherence, business leaders warn

Roundtable in Brussels warns diverging implementations of the revised Product Liability Directive increase litigation risk and undermine EU competitiveness.

Brussels, 02 April 2026 - Senior business leaders, legal experts and policymakers warned at a Brussels roundtable on 24 March that inconsistent implementations of the revised Product Liability Directive (PLD) will fragment the Single Market, increase litigation risk and weaken Europe’s competitiveness unless the European Commission provides early guidance.

read more

News

Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) in France

Pros and Cons of the new French Decree no 2025-1191 of 10 December 2025 on the admission of associations and other bodies to conduct domestic and cross-border group actions and specifying their obligations regarding publication of their fundings.

 

read more

News

Opinion on the French Decree Implementing the 2026 Class Action Regime

In accordance with the DDADUE 5 law, France has published Decree No. 2025-1191 to create a clear legal framework for collective claims supported by third party funders. The framework includes processes for authorizing organisations to represent claimants in "actions de groupe" and the law imposes important new governance and transparency norms in the field of collective litigation in France.

read more