News

EJF joins the Industy Statement on the Proposed Product Liability Directive

Europe is at a cross-roads for product liability rules. Following the proposal on a New Product Liability Directive, EJF and other European organizations urge policymakers, in a joint statement, to consider key issues such as protection against malicious mass-claims and new rules on burden of proof, to ensure a balanced and effective product liability regime that benefits both businesses and consumers. The proposed revision of the PLD, as it stands, would introduce radical changes in the EU legal landscape and it may indeed have unintended consequences for Europe's competitiveness and national justice systems. PLD could signal another move towards a litigation culture in the EU that serves primarily the economic interests of private third-party funders as well as placing an extra burden on already-stretched national court systems and state resources. Let's work together to protect European competitiveness and consumer rights via fair, effective and efficient civil rights systems in the EU.

Read more in our Joint Statement below.

 

Europe is at a cross-roads for product liability rules. Following the proposal on a New Product Liability Directive, EJF and other European organizations urge policymakers, in a joint statement, to consider key issues such as protection against malicious mass-claims and new rules on burden of proof, to ensure a balanced and effective product liability regime that benefits both businesses and consumers. The proposed revision of the PLD, as it stands, would introduce radical changes in the EU legal landscape and it may indeed have unintended consequences for Europe's competitiveness and national justice systems. PLD could signal another move towards a litigation culture in the EU that serves primarily the economic interests of private third-party funders as well as placing an extra burden on already-stretched national court systems and state resources. Let's work together to protect European competitiveness and consumer rights via fair, effective and efficient civil rights systems in the EU.

Read more in our Joint Statement below.

Share this page

News

OPEN DECLARATION CALLING FOR FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS TO GUIDE INTERPRETATION OF THE PRODUCT LIABILITY DIRECTIVE

EJF has joined a coalition of organisations (the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, MedTech Europe, CEFIC, the Digital Poland Association, Danish Industry and EFPIA calling on the European Commission to issue Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) to guide implementation of the revised Product Liability Directive (PLD) ahead of its January 2027 application deadline.

read more

News

Press Release: Liability Frameworks in the Life Sciences Sector and their Implications for the EU Single Market

On Tuesday, 9 June 2026, the European Justice Forum in partnership with European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) and MEDTECH Europe, organised a working lunch titled "Liability Frameworks in the Life Sciences Sector and their Implications for the EU Single Market", hosted by MEP Adam Jarubas, Chair of the SANT Committee and co-hosted by MEP Anna Zalewska, European Conservatives and Reformists, MEP Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, Socialists and Democrats, in the European Parliament, in Brussels.

read more

News

PRESS RELEASE: Consumer Protection and Product Liability 
Challenges in the EU - Lessons to be Learnt from the Nordics

On Monday, 8 June 2026, the European Justice Forum organised a roundtable titled "Consumer Protection and Product Liability Challenges in the EU - Lessons to be Learnt from the Nordics", held at Avenue des Arts 6-9, Brussels.

read more

News

Amendment to product liability law met with mixed reactions

Berlin: The draft bill presented by the Federal Government “on the modernisation of product liability law” has received mixed reviews from experts. At a public hearing of the Committee on Law and Consumer Protection on Monday, the planned 1:1 implementation of a corresponding EU directive was criticised by some as going too far and by others as being too unambitious.

read more